Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat News

The Newsletter of the Great Lakes
Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund

The Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat News is the newsletter of the Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund, published five times per year. The News is intended to provide a forum for the free exchange of ideas among citizens and organizations working to protect aquatic habitats in the Great Lakes Basin.

Volume 14, Number 4 • Fall 2006


Lake Ontario Basin Update

Streamlining Democracy: Queen’s Park Takes a Vacation

By Krystyn Tully, Lake Ontario Waterkeeper

Environmental issues were front-page news this summer. Energy woes, waste diversion (aka, garbage), and sewage overflows are affecting each of us. And even though the legislature has just wrapped up for the summer, we may see the Government of Ontario make some of its most important environmental decisions in the coming months.

Perhaps most alarming is the concerted effort to streamline major Ontario environmental assessments. These kinds of changes are hailed by the Toronto Star, which accuses opponents of landfills and incinerators of trying to,“block them using the environmental assessment process for political, rather than scientific, reasons.”

While business-like rhetoric that promotes efficiencies, science, and expertise might sound good in the press, it rings hollow in communities who are faced with massive environmental projects such as energy plants, mine sites, and landfills.

In early June, the Minister of Environment reassured Ontarians that all new nuclear plants will undergo a full federal environmental assessment. The problem is, according to most environmental lawyers, a nuclear plant also requires a provincial environmental assessment, a different and equally important legal process. This is an especially important check, given the Government of Canada's stake in the nuclear industry.

Waste issues like landfills, incineration, and alternative fuels are also top-of-mind in many Ontario communities. Unfortunately, decisions are being made on a case-by-case basis, without connecting to a broader provincial strategy.

For example, York and Durham are set to launch a new incineration program that could provide the fuel pellets for a cement kiln in Bath, Ontario. In the case of an alternative fuels project, the studies are all paid for and conducted by the company itself, without independent verification by the province. Both the York/Durham and the Alternative Fuels Project public study periods will continue over the course of the summer.

Accountability for infrastructure is also being downloaded to municipalities, the same institutions that are responsible for paying for upgrades and maintenance. As a result, many communities are seeing little investment in aging pipes and municipalities are ignoring the voluntary environmental standards meant to eliminate leaky combined sewer systems.

“Taking steps to address source water protection without fixing the pipes through which the water flows, is futile. Our new clean water is still traveling through old and corroding pipes to our homes. Our wastewater is still flowing through aging pipes that allow sewage to pollute our lakes and rivers,” wrote one spokesperson from the sewer and water main construction industry.

Ironically, as the government dances around these important decisions, the public is left only with the weakest environmental process. We get notification through the Environmental Registry, but announcements are often cryptic and information easily slips through the cracks. We get environmental assessments, but only those led by the proponents of a project. We get “Town Halls” but no hearings where experts testify under oath and can be questioned by citizens.

When we try to “streamline” democracy, we’re left with shoddy processes that truly are confusing and, as a result, slow. And that is what's costly. People can get involved in the federal environmental assessment process (www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca to see what's active) or the provincial permitting process (www.ene.gov.on.ca, click “Environmental Registry”).


For more information:
Krystyn Tully, Lake Ontario Waterkeeper
245 Queen's Quay West
Toronto, ONT M5J 2K9
PH: (416) 861-1237
E-mail: krystyn@waterkeeper.ca
Website:www.waterkeeper.ca


Disclaimer: The interpretations and conclusions presented in this newsletter represent the opinions of the individual authors. They in no way represent the views of the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council, the C.S. Mott Foundation, subscribers, donors, or any organization mentioned in this publication.


The Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund builds effective community-based citizen action to protect and restore the water quality of the Great Lakes basin. We work toward this goal by providing financial assistance, communications and networking assistance and technical assistance to citizens and grassroots watershed groups throughout the Great Lakes basin. Through these efforts we work with over 1,800 grassroots watershed groups and citizens to protect and restore the rivers, lakes and wetlands in their communities. The Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund, Inc. is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization.

For more information, please contact:

info@glhabitat.org
P.O. Box 2479, Petoskey, MI 49770
PH (231) 347-1181;
FX (231) 347-5928