
Success Stories:Fight
to Save a
|
![]() Russ
and Judy Bernacchi found themselves enmeshed in a 15-year struggle with their neighbors and local drainage board in efforts to save their wetland from being drained. Credit: Russ and Judy Bernacchi |
In 1994, my neighbors petitioned the board to have the ditch where the beaver dam was declared a "legal drain". According to Indiana law, just 10% of surrounding landowners are needed to bring a petition to have a ditch made a legal drain. Once it is a legal drain, the board has jurisdiction over 75 feet on both sides of the ditch. This means that they can drain wetlands and cut down trees on our property, and then we get taxed for it through our property taxes. At the hearing, I asked the board members how they determined that their actions would benefit my neighbor more than it damaged me. The board’s attorneysaid that if they had to discuss benefits and damages, the meeting would go on too long. Much to our disappointment, in September of 1994 the board voted in favor of making the ditch a legal drain.
Over the next five years we appealed the board’s actions to the Indiana Court of appeals three times. It was during our legal battles that the grants from GLAHNF really helped, as the legal fees proved to be very costly. The first and second time the appeals court sent the case back to the board for errors that they had made in their case. It was during the last appeal that the unthinkable happened. The court cited a law from 1894 that said that the draining of wetlands was in the public benefit. Now our ditch was a legal drain and we had to find a way to keep the drainage board from draining the wetland.
![]() The
Bernacchi Wetland in September 2003. This area has
developed into beautiful wetland ecology in the last
fifteen years. Credit: Russ and Judy Bernacchi |
Now that our ditch was a legal drain, the board was determined to tear out the beaver dam and drain the wetland. We tried to present alternatives to draining the wetland, such as putting in a control structure to regulate the water, as was the case for three years prior to the original lawsuit. We even had a structure drawn up, only the board wanted to set the level at a height that would also drain the wetland. We were able to get the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) to assess the situation, and they decided that the level should be at 755 feet above sea level to maintain the existing beneficial uses. The board, however, questioned IDEM’s authority over the wetland. To make matters worse, my neighbors also decided to try to sue me again to remove the dam and pay any punitive damages (damages awarded as punishment and example to others). Fortunately, the statute of limitations had run out on suing for damages.
The board continued to question whether IDEM had authority over the wetland, and it hired laborers to row across the water and remove one foot of the dam. We agreed to this since that would still be above IDEM’s recommended water level. The board removed one foot of the dam and then, much to our surprise, came back to remove another foot. Since this would be below IDEM’s level we would not allow the laborers to remove any more of the dam. The board is still writing to IDEM questioning their authority, but so far IDEM has not backed down. I think one of the most important things I have learned from all of this is that you can’t back down or stop the fight. You have to throw in any roadblock you can to delay or stop the board from taking action. This fight isn’t over yet, but it’s been 15 years and my wetland is still there. To me, that’s a victory in itself.
Bernacchi Wetland Legal Defense Fund
Russ & Judy Bernacchi
5698 South 500 West
La Porte, IN 46350-9583
219-767-2954, Email: judyb@csinet.net
|
The Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network & Fund is a project
of the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council. Funding for the project is provided by the C.S. Mott Foundation of Flint, Michigan.
For more information, contact: |